Reform Policy

Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global - download pdf or read online

Posted On March 30, 2017 at 4:58 am by / Comments Off on Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global - download pdf or read online

By Maria Yudkevich, Philip G. Altbach, Laura E. Rumbley

Educational inbreeding - appointing one's personal graduates for tutorial positions - is a arguable yet unusually universal perform the world over. This publication is the 1st comparative research of the phenomenon - the motives, implications, and way forward for inbreeding.

Show description

Read Online or Download Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global Perspectives PDF

Best reform & policy books

Download e-book for iPad: How to Prepare for and Respond to a Crisis (2nd Edition) by David J. Schonfeld, Robert Lichtenstein, Marsha Kline

Is your institution able to reply to a main issue? Are tuition employees able to deal with actual issues of safety, emotional wishes, and psychological future health effects that come up from difficulty occasions? What steps are you able to take now to arrange your college for a quandary? Use the stairs and counsel provided during this booklet to reply to those and different questions serious to surviving any drawback that touches a college.

Download PDF by Milbrey McLaughlin, Joan E. Talbert: Building School-based Teacher Learning Communities:

Construction on broad facts that school-based instructor studying groups increase pupil results, this publication lays out an time table to boost and maintain collaborative expert cultures. McLaughlin and Talbert? —foremost students of faculty swap and educating contexts? —provide an inside of examine the techniques, assets, and approach thoughts which are essential to construct vivid school-based instructor studying groups.

Download PDF by Julie Rowlands: Academic Governance in the Contemporary University:

This e-book addresses 3 principal questions in modern collage governance: (1) How and why has educational governance in Anglophone international locations replaced lately and what influence have those alterations had on present practices? (2) How do energy relatives inside universities have an effect on judgements approximately educating and learn and what are the results for tutorial voices?

Additional resources for Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education: Global Perspectives

Example text

Finally, universities may prefer hiring inbred candidates if the teaching mission is important for them. In this case, inbred faculty may be hired not for their scholarly performance but for their “teaching potential” (Eisenberg and Wells 2000), including their ability to teach certain courses and to fit into existing university curricula. ), evaluation of teaching qualities is more problematic and may be only assessable over the longer term. Inbred academics may contribute to the formation of specific, highly localized approaches to teaching, as they are “guided by the experience gained as former students of this university and, later, as teaching assistants there” in the design of their own courses (Sivak and Yudkevich 2012, 4).

So, sometimes measures dealing not with inbreeding itself, but with its consequences, may also be useful to consider. In this section, possible measures to eliminate inbreeding, as well as ways to deal with the problems it presents, have been discussed. In different countries, various strategies have been tested. Most of the literature on the topic shows that institutionalized measures that either forbid hiring one’s own graduates or make the selection and promotion mechanisms more transparent and competitive are rather useful, and can help to diminish the level of inbreeding in universities.

The authors also concluded that the importance of social connections in the process of hiring may lead to hiring not only the best graduates but also other students, who, for instance, performed well in class but are not very successful in scholarly terms. This happens because sometimes faculty members fail to evaluate their own graduates “as objectively as they evaluate other schools’ graduates” as they may be “too close to their own school’s graduates to judge them well” (Eisenberg and Wells 2000, 387).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.36 of 5 – based on 27 votes